From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:17:44 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: argus bind dmraid kismet libeXosip2 ltra etc... In-Reply-To: <1232968874.2298.60.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Mon\, 26 Jan 2009 12\:21\:14 +0100") References: <20090126003405.2EE7776D28@busybox.osuosl.org> <873af6d219.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1232968874.2298.60.camel@elrond.atmel.com> Message-ID: <87eiyq9s7r.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: Ulf> Most of these indicate "Machine not recognized" >From configure? Isn't that solved by the $(CONFIG_UPDATE) stuff? Ulf> I think one of them indicated something similar Ulf> to "header"-.h not found. Ulf> I consider them as totally broken for AVR32 until proven otherwise. Ulf> I would prefer them to depend on !BR2_avr32 in the distribution Ulf> (not the svn), but that is apparently not popular. Ulf> Totally meaninless to even attempt to build a package Ulf> if there is 0% of success. Agree. Ulf> HCE wants it to be there in the hope of that someone will Ulf> need the support on AVR32 so much that they will fix it, Ulf> but the casual user should not include them and fail the build. I agree, I just questioned the need for avr32 specific fixups (besides an updated config.{guess,sub} in those packages that mostly don't seem to be very hw specific. HcE: Is the package list correct? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard