[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: enable musl for riscv

[Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:

 > Hello,
 > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:23:31 +0200
 > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> wrote:

 >> Since version 1.1.23 musl supports the RISC-V architecture.
 >> 
 >> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
 >> ---
 >> toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 2 +-
 >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 >> 
 >> diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
 >> index d9f16e2a3a..b4168bd40c 100644
 >> --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
 >> +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
 >> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL
 >> depends on BR2_aarch64	   || BR2_arm   || BR2_armeb   || BR2_i386 || \
 >> BR2_microblaze  || BR2_mips  || BR2_mipsel  || BR2_mips64 || \
 >> BR2_mips64el    || BR2_or1k  || BR2_powerpc || BR2_powerpc64 || \
 >> -		   BR2_powerpc64le || BR2_sh    || BR2_x86_64
 >> +		   BR2_powerpc64le || BR2_riscv || BR2_sh      || BR2_x86_64

 > My understanding is that musl 1.1.23 only supports RISC-V 64 bits, not
 > RISC-V 32 bits, so that should probably be "BR2_RISCV_64" instead of
 > just "BR2_riscv".

Ups, indeed - I'll fix that up.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard