From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 11:35:46 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Qt5 LTS handling [was: package/qt5: bump latest version to 5.12.4] In-Reply-To: <51e24fc6-c609-b1b9-b2f3-5bf213b71436@mind.be> (Arnout Vandecappelle's message of "Sat, 13 Jul 2019 22:05:02 +0200") References: <20190710173645.15459-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20190710173645.15459-2-ps.report@gmx.net> <891f19e9-a64b-c025-b5cd-f7a0517fbc35@mind.be> <20190711210233.0b7eb0aa@gmx.net> <93af8798-0395-2c9f-dd0f-aad677dc0909@mind.be> <20190712211529.00fbf6e0@gmx.net> <8f646260-7e2b-8d47-82c0-2624e86cfb56@mind.be> <87k1cm9smt.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <51e24fc6-c609-b1b9-b2f3-5bf213b71436@mind.be> Message-ID: <87ftn99cwd.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: Hi, > Just as a reminder: if we just have latest, we would end up with Qt 5.14 in > 2020.02, but that will stop receiving updates in June or so. So we will have > half a year without (security) updates to Qt. > IMO, LTS is best effort so this is acceptable. I guess so too. We so had very few qt updates in our LTS series anyway: for i in 2017 2018 2019; do echo $i.02:; git shortlog -sn $i.02..$i.02.x -- package/qt5; done 2017.02: 5 Peter Seiderer 3 Ga?l PORTAY 2 Bartosz Golaszewski 2 Yann E. MORIN 1 Peter Korsgaard 1 Vicente Olivert Riera 2018.02: 6 Ga?l PORTAY 3 S?bastien Szymanski 2 Laurent Hartanerot 2 Peter Korsgaard 1 Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) 1 Giulio Benetti 1 Joshua Henderson 1 Manfred Schlaegl 1 Peter Seiderer 1 Romain Reignier 2019.02: 2 Giulio Benetti 1 Fabrice Fontaine 1 Ga?l PORTAY And none of them afaik were directly security fixes. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard