From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 23:51:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 06/16 v3] core: introduce a generated kconfig snippet In-Reply-To: <7188ad8d-469c-f4f8-9411-46761b05bddf@mind.be> (Arnout Vandecappelle's message of "Thu, 1 Sep 2016 23:30:47 +0200") References: <20160827161601.2fd0e8f5@free-electrons.com> <87poosaa9d.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20160901175221.GA5841@free.fr> <87k2evwiqd.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <7188ad8d-469c-f4f8-9411-46761b05bddf@mind.be> Message-ID: <87fupjwapm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle writes: Hi, >> > So, what's the idea: >> > - remove all packages (easy) >> > - keep as-is (even easier) >> > - only keep virtual packages (not easy at all) >> >> Personally I would go for 1, but if 3 is doable without too much work / >> complexity (and you feel up for it), then that is also OK with me. > Well, option 2 is not the end of the world either. The reason we consider it > now is that some complexity (1 line!) has to be added in the manual.mk to > continue supporting it. It is starting to violate the KISS principle, but not > overly so. That and the fact that more than half the user manual content is this list of packages, even though it doesn't have much value. -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard