From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 23:34:53 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Binutils: ARC: Fix build failures if makeinfo is missing In-Reply-To: <20160606215833.57396ae8@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:58:33 +0200") References: <1465211659-23861-1-git-send-email-vzakhar@synopsys.com> <87twh6hzxl.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20160606215833.57396ae8@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <87fusqgfwi.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: > Hello, > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:36:54 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Zakharov Vlad >> >> Committed, thanks. > Why? It was fixing autobuilder issues and seemed like a sensible fix that could be upstreamed. Looking again, I do see that it patched Makefile.in and not Makefile.am, so that's not too nice though. > This problem also exists for other versions of binutils, and also for > gdb. And we have a patch series from Romain Naour sitting in patchwork > for several weeks. > I don't know if Zlad's version is better or not than Romain's version. > But at least Romain's version was handling all binutils and gdb > versions, without patching directly Makefile.in files. So at first > sight, it looked a lot better than Zlad's version. Ok, we can always revert if it isn't needed any more once Romain's series is applied. -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard