Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] qt5: expose a QT5_QMAKE variable for other Qt5 packages
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:39:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fve02cbm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141103222519.7c8797e9@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:25:19 +0100")

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

Hi,

 >> This (and elsewhere) shows a bit of a mixup between BR2_PACKAGE_QT5 and
 >> qt5base - But ok, having BR2_PACKAGE_QT5 enabled without qt5base isn't
 >> really sensible (but is allowed by kconfig).

 > I hesitated between qt5.mk or qt5base.mk. I decided to go with qt5.mk,
 > with the following reasoning:

 >  * I wanted to name the variable QT5_QMAKE and not QT5BASE_QMAKE, to
 >    mimic what exists for qt4 (variable is named QT_QMAKE).

 >  * Since the variable was going to be named QT5_QMAKE, I found it would
 >    be odd to have it in qt5base.mk where all variables are
 >    QT5BASE_<foo>. So I went with qt5.mk instead.

Ok.

 >> Should we just use BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE everywhere you check for BR2_PACKAGE_QT5?

 > Where exactly? Or shouldn't we have qt5base selected as soon as qt5 is
 > enabled?

Well, that's perhaps the easiest solution, yes. Having qt5 enabled but
not qt5base doesn't make any sense.

Will you send an updated series or should I do that here?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-03 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-01 22:15 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] package: prepare to support modules that work with Qt or Qt5 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-01 22:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] qt5: expose a QT5_QMAKE variable for other Qt5 packages Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-02 22:46   ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-11-03 21:25     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-03 21:39       ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2014-11-03 21:46         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-03 22:00           ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-11-01 22:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] qjson: allow building with Qt5 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-01 22:15 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] qextserialport: " Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-03 22:07 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] package: prepare to support modules that work with Qt or Qt5 Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fve02cbm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
    --to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox