From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:19:39 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] eglibc: bump to version 2.19 SVN R25243 In-Reply-To: <5343E30C.1090703@zacarias.com.ar> (Gustavo Zacarias's message of "Tue, 08 Apr 2014 08:52:44 -0300") References: <1396875879-22199-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20140407152919.2d1147fb@skate> <5342A9EB.1030801@zacarias.com.ar> <20140407154148.2b35dd34@skate> <5343E30C.1090703@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <87fvloau90.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias writes: Hi, >> Fine with me. My impression so far was that for critical components >> such as gcc/binutils/gdb/libc, we were keeping older versions a little >> bit longer to give it some time to test the newer version before >> forcing everyone to upgrade. Surely we need to continue to do this with >> gcc, where most of the 4.x.0 versions are typically broken on at least >> one architecture. > D'oh, eglibc 2.19 is broken for PowerPC SPE ABI. > So it seems we'll do two versions after all. > I'll send a revised patch shortly. Ok, thanks. It anyway seems like the safest option (and matches our other toolchain-related packages) -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard