From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:03:06 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] 2009.02-rc3 released In-Reply-To: <3465FC6D-040F-475F-8AFA-BB3F1F0C7E5E@arcormail.de> (Claus Klein's message of "Sat\, 7 Feb 2009 23\:10\:44 +0100") References: <87skmyirxq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <3465FC6D-040F-475F-8AFA-BB3F1F0C7E5E@arcormail.de> Message-ID: <87fxip8a39.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Claus" == Claus Klein writes: Claus> Hi, Claus> I tried to build the default busybox on mac-OX, but it failed. Claus> A year ago, I tried to build a buildsystem based on a minmal system Claus> like DSL using busybox tools. Claus> but it failed too. Claus> I want to build a cross-development tool-chain and the embedded Claus> destination system at a small virtual vmware image. Claus> So I want to ask if it is possible to use only posix conform options Claus> when building a system with buildroot? Claus> At leased, the options available at the busybox should be enough, or Claus> not? Sure, but as none of the regular BR developers build on macosx, chances are that you'll find broken stuff. Cleanup patches are ofcourse welcome. Claus> And to start, there is a small patch to fix my first problem I had: I cleaned up the sed invocation instead in r25264, could you give it a try please? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard