From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:04:15 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] target/device/Atmel kernel patches In-Reply-To: <1233253891.4147.51.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Thu\, 29 Jan 2009 19\:31\:31 +0100") References: <87ab9d4w6j.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1233005366.2298.118.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <871vup4ul9.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1233008389.2298.129.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <87vds114op.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <871vumtb1w.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <8763jyrtfb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <69C4B5A4F9B74F77AE1E58B4F020A786@aeglos> <87skn2qch5.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1233253891.4147.51.camel@elrond.atmel.com> Message-ID: <87fxj2q6hc.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: >> No, but we're doing a bunch of cleanups now - And as I mentioned before, >> the arch-arm directory seems a bit extreme as it is. Ulf> I much prefer that we avoid doing this under time pressure Ulf> and come to an agreememt on how to do a good implementation Ulf> after the first release. Ok, but I guess we can atleast remove the support for 2.6.21.1 (as there's 2.6.21.5) and 2.6.26-rc3 (as there's 2.6.26) ? >> I don't think adding a bunch of special case handling to buildroot to >> download AT91 patches from somewhere is a better solution. We should >> rather generalize the setup so you can handle it outside BR and just >> point BR to a repo or a directory full of patches. >> Ulf> I am for generic solutions, but not at the expense of ease of use. Ulf> That is why it needs some pondering, before a solution is selected. I'm not for ease of use over everything else, it also has to be manageable for the developers - But yes, the easier we can make it to use at the same time, the better. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard