From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:39:10 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: add version 2.23.1
In-Reply-To: <CAFbHwiTmCbwarYSgnD7ZkRob7SOVK2T_4Obz6jCR5eJj75j=rA@mail.gmail.com>
 (Will Newton's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:27:15 +0000")
References: <1352988528-20158-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <87lie25299.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
 <CAFbHwiRBmDSdfWL2pxFRrS-xkRoa0VB_FgrjFDk2oQG42pxeuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A5094F.8080001@zacarias.com.ar>
 <CAFbHwiTmCbwarYSgnD7ZkRob7SOVK2T_4Obz6jCR5eJj75j=rA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87haoq510h.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Will" == Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com> writes:

 Will> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Gustavo Zacarias
 Will> <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> wrote:
 >> On 11/15/2012 12:17 PM, Will Newton wrote:
 >> 
 >>> I believe that 2.23 was never officially packaged so it is probably
 >>> better to remove it.
 >> 
 >> It's in official GNU mirrors, i'd say it has been.
 >> Doesn't mean we should keep it though.

 >> From the 2.23.1 release announcement:

 Will> "Thanks to everyone who contributed to the release. The branch remains
 Will> open for bug fixes.

 Will> Note that because of packaging issues, binutils 2.23 was not released."

 Will> I'm not sure what the precise issues were but it seems safer to
 Will> move to 2.23.1.

I agree. Gustavo, could you respin the patch to replace 2.23 with 2.23.1
instead?


-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard