From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:14:15 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] problem building openswan using svn-buildroot In-Reply-To: <20090223102825.GB31413@cbg.dyndns.org> (Steffen Schulz's message of "Mon\, 23 Feb 2009 11\:28\:25 +0100") References: <499E05A7.2070403@unix-beratung.de> <87bpsv6ik4.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <49A17E91.7060104@unix-beratung.de> <87y6vy5okv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090223102825.GB31413@cbg.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <87hc2l2yns.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Steffen" == Steffen Schulz writes: Hi, Robert> thanks for your reply. I was beginning to get the impression Robert> that nobody cares about openswan :) Is there a better Robert> alternative? >> >> Sorry, I don't know - Anyone else? Steffen> strongSwan is, to my knowledge, the only free IKEv1/IKEv2 server Steffen> that is in active development and ready for productive use. Steffen> It's far from small though. Ok, anyone wants to step up and support openswan/strongswan? Otherwise I think our users are better off if we remove the package. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard