From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:19:04 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/linux In-Reply-To: <20090109063009.8E640768C5@busybox.osuosl.org> (ulf@uclibc.org's message of "Fri\, 9 Jan 2009 06\:30\:09 +0000 \(UTC\)") References: <20090109063009.8E640768C5@busybox.osuosl.org> Message-ID: <87hc48rg53.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "ulf" == ulf writes: ulf> Author: ulf ulf> Date: 2009-01-09 06:30:08 +0000 (Fri, 09 Jan 2009) ulf> New Revision: 24729 ulf> Log: ulf> Make sure U-boot is built, if we do make uImage ulf> Modified: ulf> trunk/buildroot/target/linux/Config.in.advanced ulf> Changeset: ulf> Modified: trunk/buildroot/target/linux/Config.in.advanced ulf> =================================================================== ulf> --- trunk/buildroot/target/linux/Config.in.advanced 2009-01-08 23:01:50 UTC (rev 24728) ulf> +++ trunk/buildroot/target/linux/Config.in.advanced 2009-01-09 06:30:08 UTC (rev 24729) ulf> @@ -464,6 +464,7 @@ ulf> config BR2_LINUX_BIN_UIMAGE ulf> bool "uImage" ulf> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LINUX ulf> + select BR2_TARGET_UBOOT Silently selecting something as big and with so many configuration options as U-Boot isn't that nice - I think it would be nicer to depend on UBOOT instead. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard