From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:45:59 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Still no answer for a contribution made in March In-Reply-To: <0c2401c8cc99$baad47c0$0c0514ac@atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Thu\, 12 Jun 2008 16\:18\:41 +0200") References: <20080611161156.33737116@crazy> <46a136670806110808x737929a4red33f32c593ae6e2@mail.gmail.com> <20080611154121.GI3795@mx.loc> <20080612095933.25f3345e@crazy> <871w33doy1.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <0c2401c8cc99$baad47c0$0c0514ac@atmel.com> Message-ID: <87hcby8xmw.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: >> Hi, >> >> >> Yea, and that's the reason why the svn-repo is completely fux0red up. >> Thomas> I don't necessarly think so. Here, the issue is not a bottleneck at the Thomas> commit level, but rather a patch review bandwidth problem. >> >> Agree - And lack of testing before stuff gets checked in. The deeper >> issue is that we don't do releases I guess, so there's a tension >> between doing development, and having something stable for actual use. >> Ulf> Maybe we should start? Fine by me, but that means we'll need to spend time stabilizing the tree and make sure the packages actually work (on multiple archs). Do you have time to help on this? That's why I want to get buildbot up and running. Ulf> Other project are using "git" and is sneering at "svn". Ulf> Should we change? We could, but there's no infrastructure for git on uclibc.org, and the other uclibc.org projects use svn. I don't think it matters much, as you can just use git-svn (like I do). -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard