From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] core/pkg-generic: fix instrumentation for packages that install nowhere
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 22:18:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im277yza.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210613143207.2445691-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Sun, 13 Jun 2021 16:32:07 +0200")
>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes:
> A (target [0]) package can independently declare installing in various
> locations: target, staging, or images. The default is to only install
> in target.
> When a package opts out from installing to target, but does not opts
> in to install in any other location, the package is not downloaded,
> extracted, patched, configured, nor built at all. As a consequence, none
> of the per-step instrumentation is not executed, specifically the
> listing of files before/after the package sequence.
> Down the line, the package infra does not cope well with that situation,
> because the gathering-install step, the one that synchronises all the
> optional target, staging, or images install steps, still gets run.
> And as #13836 shows, this does not go well:
> /bin/sh: /home/tbuild/myboard/build/foo/.files-list.after: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [/home/tbuild/myboard/build/foo/.stamp_installed] Error 1
> make: *** [_all] Error 2
> So, we should have ensured that the gathering-install step itself
> depends on the build step, which would have solved the issue.
> However, this bug really illustrates a more fundamental issue: does it
> even make sense to have a package that installs nothing in any location?
> Indeed, why even bother with that package to begin with if it will not
> provide anything at all?
> It turns out that yes, this makes sense. We have some packages, that
> do not install anything at all, and do not even build anything; they are
> there just to ensure that we can download something that will ultimately
> be used by another package. This is the case for example for packages
> that provide linux extensions, like aufs [1].
> Additionally, some ugly out-of-tree packages could conceivably install
> things during the build (or even configure!) steps. That's not unheard
> of... [2]
> So, the solution is to ensure that the gathering-install step does
> depend on the build step, to trigger the proper dependency chain and
> have the instrumentation hooks properly run even in that degenerate
> case.
> Fixes: #13836
> [0] a host package can't opt out of installing anything.
> [1] that one is actually missing AUFS_INSTALL_TARGET = NO, so this
> hides the issue.
> [2] even us are not 100% clean on that topic: gcc will install files in
> staging and target as part of the same step (not the build, granted,
> but still...)
> Reported-by: "Weber, Matthew L Collins" <Matthew.Weber@collins.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Committed to 2021.02.x and 2021.05.x, thanks.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-13 14:32 [Buildroot] [PATCH] core/pkg-generic: fix instrumentation for packages that install nowhere Yann E. MORIN
2021-06-15 19:40 ` [Buildroot] [External] " Weber, Matthew L Collins
2021-06-16 19:59 ` Yann E. MORIN
2021-06-21 20:18 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87im277yza.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox