From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:19:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 03/11] package/dropwatch: license is GPL-2.0+ In-Reply-To: <20191113151724.12155-4-peter@korsgaard.com> References: <20191113151724.12155-1-peter@korsgaard.com> <20191113151724.12155-4-peter@korsgaard.com> Message-ID: <87imnneol1.fsf@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Peter, On Wed, Nov 13 2019, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Dropwatch links with readline, which is GPL-3.0+, so not compatible with > GPL-2.0. When asked about this, upstream has clarified that the license > really is GPL-2.0+: > > https://github.com/nhorman/dropwatch/issues/14 > > Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard > --- > package/dropwatch/dropwatch.mk | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/package/dropwatch/dropwatch.mk b/package/dropwatch/dropwatch.mk > index 1af61458e0..53d3683c5a 100644 > --- a/package/dropwatch/dropwatch.mk > +++ b/package/dropwatch/dropwatch.mk > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > DROPWATCH_VERSION = 1.5.1 > DROPWATCH_SITE = $(call github,nhorman,dropwatch,v$(DROPWATCH_VERSION)) > DROPWATCH_DEPENDENCIES = libnl readline host-pkgconf $(TARGET_NLS_DEPENDENCIES) > -DROPWATCH_LICENSE = GPL-2.0 > +DROPWATCH_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+ Maybe add a link to upstream license clarification in a comment? baruch > DROPWATCH_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING > # From git > DROPWATCH_AUTORECONF = YES -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -