From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:06:04 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Buildroot cleanup
In-Reply-To: <20090909082447.7a230c8f@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of
	"Wed\, 9 Sep 2009 08\:24\:47 +0200")
References: <4AA62DD20200000D00128C56@gwia.alliedtelesyn.co.nz>
	<4AA75F310200007000017827@gwia.alliedtelesyn.co.nz>
	<4AA75F310200007000017827@gwia.alliedtelesyn.co.nz>
	<1252440948.19600.4.camel@bender> <87vdjt160i.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
	<20090909082447.7a230c8f@surf>
Message-ID: <87iqfs1tsz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

Hi,

 Thomas> That was my plan...

 >> This would make BR less selfcontained / one-stop-shop though.

 Thomas> until I met Buildroot users (I mean not end-users but organizations
 Thomas> using Buildroot as the build system they ship with their devices) who
 Thomas> told me that the selfcontained nature of BR was something they really
 Thomas> liked.

Yes, I know - I like it myself ;) But maybe integrating crosstool-ng
support would be good enough?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard