From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:02:43 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] apply-patches.sh: use series file to
	apply patches in proper order
In-Reply-To: <20120321082335.GH11834@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320> (Ludovic
 Desroches's message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:23:35 +0100")
References: <20120314120310.13e0ea3a@skate>
 <1331739237-29872-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
 <1331739237-29872-7-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
 <871uomkh2d.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
 <20120321082335.GH11834@ldesroches-Latitude-E6320>
Message-ID: <87k42e5nt8.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Ludovic" == Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> writes:

 Ludovic> Thanks to take this set of patches.

I'm afraid I'll have to revert patch 5+6 unless we can fix it up though,
as the tarball change broke the build for (atleast) liblockfile:

http://buildroot.humanoidz.org/results/cf2f653df3e083b75d3f8d0f4020a68100588d2d/build-end.log

The patch tarball contains:

.
??? debian
    ??? changelog
    ??? control
    ??? patches
    ??? ??? 02-COPYRIGHT.patch
    ??? ??? 04-505851-remove-debug-code.patch
    ??? ??? 06-493462-dotlockfile.1.patch
    ??? ??? 07-493462-dotlockfile.c.patch
    ??? ??? 09-562937-make-ar-overwrittable.patch
    ??? ??? series
    ??? postinst
    ??? postinst.nfs
    ??? postrm
    ??? prerm.nfs
    ??? rules
    ??? shlibs
    ??? shlibs.nfslock
    ??? source
        ??? format
        ??? options

I guess it worked more by accident than anything else before, but I
think we should atleast ensure we only apply files matching
*.{patch,diff} inside the tarballs.

I don't have a problem with having to add a specific post-patch hook for
liblockfile similar to E.G. argus, but we need to get it to work.

Care to have a look?
-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard