From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 06:00:23 +0300
Subject: [Buildroot] ebtables and musl
In-Reply-To: <CAGt4E5s_t30GHmTFiSA3MZQo0Vj-fkqvGPPc9kNdoa6w6-B7DA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGt4E5tuHRkxko=NPY+-YsWwnhk1McnJMU_LmdcShHFuRjTkMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200613132317.4edb7676@gmx.net> <20200613144325.6c88eb8d@gmx.net>
 <CAGt4E5s_t30GHmTFiSA3MZQo0Vj-fkqvGPPc9kNdoa6w6-B7DA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87lfkqe4hk.fsf@tarshish>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hi Markus,

On Sat, Jun 13 2020, Markus Mayer wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 05:43, Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:10:28 -0700, Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> > > While we are on the topic of ebtables, why is buildroot still using
>> > > v2.0.10-4 from 2014 when there is 2.0.11 from 2019 (as per
>> > > http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/ebtables/)? Is it just a matter of
>> > > submitting a patch to update it or is there an underlying reason to
>> > > keep the old version around?
>> >
>> > Probably not, care to send an ebtables update patch?
>
> Sure. I'll send a patch.

We have a version upgrade patch in patchwork:

  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20200427212653.29933-1-ryanbarnett3 at gmail.com/

You might want to test and contribute your Tested-by.

baruch

-- 
                                                     ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -