From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:27:58 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 12/23] qt: respect silent mode instead non existing verbose mode In-Reply-To: <20091007130206.1a6f9821@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Wed\, 7 Oct 2009 13\:02\:06 +0200") References: <1254907246-5650-1-git-send-email-mroth@nessie.de> <1254907246-5650-13-git-send-email-mroth@nessie.de> <20091007115741.4f5e44df@surf> <200910071230.48080.mroth@nessie.de> <20091007130206.1a6f9821@surf> Message-ID: <87ljjnmojl.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> Le Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:30:43 +0200, Thomas> Michael Roth a ?crit : >> Commit 89464a96015e89da07b87d18b31f4b25b4c890ba introduced QUIET. Thomas> Hum correct. My tree was in branch not rebased against the very latest Thomas> Buildroot git. FYI, that commit just reintroduced it, as it got lost in the reorganization. We've had it for ~1 year before that (43af3d3578(. >> But you're right. I overlooked VERBOSE. Maybe this should be split >> into two ifs? Thomas> I think we should make a formal decision on the respective semantic of Thomas> VERBOSE and QUIET, because the difference between these two variables Thomas> is not clear to me. Yes, it's a bit of a mess. Is there anything using VERBOSE yet? The complains with BR has historically been that it has been TOO verbose, not too less. Maybe this would be a good subject for the dev day? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard