From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:31:02 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] kernel image size depends on toolchain? In-Reply-To: <484F8F05.2040105@gin.de> (Andreas Kuehn's message of "Wed\, 11 Jun 2008 10\:38\:29 +0200") References: <484F8157.2050902@gin.de> <87hcc0pfrr.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <484F8F05.2040105@gin.de> Message-ID: <87lk1cmi7d.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Kuehn writes: Hi, Andreas> That is how I found that thing. It simply doesn't fit into my boot Andreas> flash anymore. Andreas> And Yes, it is the same, not even a copy, .config file for both trys. Andreas> The reason why I need the "new" uclibc is, that I need access to the Andreas> PIOs of my at91sam9261 and at91sam9263 controllers. And the "old" Andreas> uclibc has this mmap bug that creates an page overflow error. Andreas> Is there a chance that something in the uclibc like the Andreas> LARGEFILESUPPORT creates some static or incompressable data block? That doesn't sound likely. Are the vmlinux files also different in sizes? Try comparing output of $CROSS-nm on the vmlinux files. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard