From: Baruch Siach via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Danilo Bargen <mail@dbrgn.ch>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] DMARC on this mailing list
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:03:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtjufzh1.fsf@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117105017.28d6aacc@c3po>
Hi Danilo,
On Mon, Jan 17 2022, Danilo Bargen wrote:
> I recently enabled report-only DMARC on my e-mail domain. After sending
> a few e-mails to this ML yesterday, this resulted in multiple DMARC
> would-be rejection e-mails.
>
> DMARC relies on SPF (correct sender IP) *or* DKIM (correct signature). A
> nice tool to visualize this is https://www.learndmarc.com/. If either
> SPF or DKIM passes, the e-mail should be accepted.
>
> In the case of mailing lists, the way I understand it, there are two
> options:
>
> - Rewrite the "From:" header so that the e-mail appears to be coming
> from the ML itself. Put the original sender e-mail in the "Reply-To"
> header instead. If this is not being done, the sender IP (the mailing
> list) does not match the sender e-mail domain and SPF fails. Note
> that this *might* impact the buildroot ML reputation for some big
> mailservers.
> - Expect that mail servers with DMARC enabled also have DKIM enabled,
> and ensure that the e-mail body is not modified (i.e. turn off the
> automatically inserted footer). Put mailing list unsubscribe links
> in the headers instead. This way, even though the sender IP does not
> match, the signature should still be intact.
>
> These approaches are described in the following blog post I found
> online: https://begriffs.com/posts/2018-09-18-dmarc-mailing-list.html
>
> I don't know if mailman allows turning off body modifications (i.e.
> RFC2369 and RFC2919), but it definitely allows "From"-munging:
> https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
>
> I'm still quite new to this mailing list and don't want to put out any
> demands, but I wanted to bring up this issue, since it will probably be
> more and more of an issue in the future (DMARC adoption is increasing).
I can't comment for the owners of the Buildroot list. But you might find
this recent discussion from the linux-arm-kernel list interesting:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/202110211313.B5C5C61@keescook/
In this thread David Woodhouse describes the lists.infradead.org setup
rationale.
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-17 9:50 [Buildroot] DMARC on this mailing list Danilo Bargen
2022-01-17 10:03 ` Baruch Siach via buildroot [this message]
2022-01-17 10:24 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-01-17 12:57 ` Danilo Bargen
2022-01-17 13:03 ` Danilo Bargen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtjufzh1.fsf@tarshish \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=mail@dbrgn.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox