From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mario Lang <mlang@blind.guru>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 23:01:23 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/icu: bump version to 60.1
In-Reply-To: <20171203210012.0cb2bc4c@windsurf.home> (Thomas Petazzoni's
 message of "Sun, 3 Dec 2017 21:00:12 +0100")
References: <20171203194140.8138-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de>
 <20171203210012.0cb2bc4c@windsurf.home>
Message-ID: <87mv2zv5cc.fsf@home.blind.guru>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Sun,  3 Dec 2017 20:41:40 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
>> Removed 0006-i18n-Drop-include-xlocale.h.patch, problem was fixed
>> upstream with a different solution:
>> http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/changeset/40603
>> 
>> Added upstream sha512 hash and license hash.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de>
>
> Curious: how many packages that depend on ICU did you build?

Just gave this a whirl.  The following packages
at least build successfully with icu 60.1:

boost (locale), brltty (from patch-queue), dovecot, harfbuzz, xerces

> From past experience, each major ICU bump very often causes a number
> of build failures in other packages.

None spotted so far.

-- 
CYa,
  ?????