From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:50:03 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Upgrading from Buildroot 0.10 to 2009.08 (ARM) In-Reply-To: (Joachim Pihl's message of "Sat\, 7 Nov 2009 11\:24\:01 +0100") References: <20091106100459.2624b645@surf> <20091106105325.440f0373@surf> <87k4y2ve5w.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <87my2wu1o4.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Joachim" == Joachim Pihl writes: Hi, >> Yes, NTPL support in uclibc is still very much work in progress. Joachim> Just before I left work yesterday, I discovered that the uclibc Joachim> .config (inherited from previous project) had "use linuxthreads" set, Joachim> while buildroot had NPTL set. The mismatch here could be what we are Joachim> looking for? No, buildroot rewrites that part of the uclibc config (see toolchain/uClibc/uclibc.mk) Joachim> I would much prefer NPTL if it works, since our applications Joachim> are heavily multithreaded (for architecture clarity reasons, Joachim> among other things), and I suspect that some of the Joachim> performance issues we have could be caused by context Joachim> switch/scheduling latency. You should probably check on the uclibc list, but there's afaik no NPTL support for any architecture in any released uclibc versions. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard