From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] *clean targets
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:28:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my40hkmz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091009094809.GH2266@mx.loc> (Bernhard Reutner-Fischer's message of "Fri\, 9 Oct 2009 11\:48\:09 +0200")
>>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> writes:
Hi,
>> * On the clean target
>>
>> I see that all the stamps are removed. So this will trigger
>> basically a reconfigure + rebuild of all packages. Is this what we
>> want ?
Bernhard> yes, this is what i as a user would expect.
Bernhard> Something broke, i have to rebuild stuff, so i
Bernhard> make clean ; make
So in other words, we should just have clean and distclean, where the
only difference between those two is that clean doesn't delete your
.config?
>> Same question as before: is removing the target/ directory without
>> removing the staging/ directory really safe ?
>>
>> Removing $(IMAGE) will not do anything, since $(IMAGE) is the prefix
>> for the filesystem images. I.e, the tar image is $(IMAGE).tar.
Bernhard> the IMAGE was there already. Ask Ulf what it was ment to be.
Ok, but lets really fix up stuff now that we're changing these things.
>> Shouldn't we just remove $(BINARIES_DIR) ?
Bernhard> works for me, but they have to be regenerated anyway, so not
Bernhard> much point, i'd say.
They should imho get removed so the user doesn't get confused if the
build fails, but they still see (old) binaries in BINARIES_DIR.
But ok, moot point if we make clean remove everything.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 16:24 [Buildroot] [RFC] *clean targets Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-07 16:32 ` Sven Neumann
2009-10-07 18:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-07 18:25 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-07 18:26 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-07 18:31 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-07 19:31 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-09 8:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-07 18:27 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-09 7:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-09 8:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-09 9:48 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-09 11:28 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2009-11-20 13:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-11-20 15:28 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-11-20 15:55 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-11-20 16:19 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-11-20 16:20 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87my40hkmz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox