From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:37:08 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] configs/raspberrypi3: sync kernel version with rpi/rpi2 In-Reply-To: <57212C26.5090308@beneth.fr> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Beno=C3=AEt?= Mauduit"'s message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:16:22 +0200") References: <878u00o2oi.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <874maoo0al.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <87wpnkmf65.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20160426213916.241241c7@gmx.net> <571FD66D.9050305@beneth.fr> <87d1pa23b2.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <57212C26.5090308@beneth.fr> Message-ID: <87oa8uzqbf.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Beno?t" == Beno?t Mauduit writes: > On 04/27/2016 10:40 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> >> Ehh, but we are already using rpi-4.4.y? (3de2328 from April 21st) - >> With that said, we can certainly move to e63db5. Care to send a patch to >> update raspberry{,2,3}_defconfig? >> > Ouuups, I was already on this 4.4 branch after trying to work on Kodi, > before April 21st, I missed the buildroot change... > Patchs are ready for raspberry{,2,3}_defconfig, I am just waiting a > build to confirm that it is working. Thanks. What about rpi1? > I took the last commit on rpi-4.4.y branch, which is now : > 26f3b72a9c049be10e6af196252283e1f6ab9d1f. (Kernel 4.4.8). Ok. > Just a question, seeing how buildroot manage defconfig : Is it really > useful to add comments (And re-order Kconfig option) in defconfig ? Some > people read defconfigs ? We don't really have any strong policy about it. I do find the commits are nice for documentation, but it is true that they break 'make savedefconfig'. Anybody else having an opinion about this? -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard