[Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01 if EABIhf is used

[Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>]

>>>>> "Hadrien" == Hadrien Boutteville <hadrien.boutteville@gmail.com> writes:

 > SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so 5_01_00_01 is still used if
 > EABIhf is not available.

 > Signed-off-by: Hadrien Boutteville <hadrien.boutteville@gmail.com>
 > ---
 > Changes v2 -> v3:
 >   - comment was not clear (Thomas)

 > Changes v1 -> v2:
 >   - bump to 5_01_01_01 only if EABIhf is used as we still need to
 >     support softfp (Yann)
 > ---
 >  package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk | 8 +++++---
 >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

 > diff --git a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk
 > index 324e19c..4e83f1e 100644
 > --- a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk
 > +++ b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk
 > @@ -4,15 +4,17 @@
 >  #
 >  ################################################################################
 
 > -TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01
 > -TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475
 > -
 > +# SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if EABIhf is
 > +# not available.
 >  ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y)
 > +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_01_01
 >  TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin
 >  else
 > +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01
 >  TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin
 >  endif
 
 > +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475

So it uses the same soname for the two releases? Yes, apparently.

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard