From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:51:25 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] toolchain-external: update Linaro
	AArch64 toolchains
In-Reply-To: <20131229185313.43b17aaa@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of
 "Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:53:13 +0100")
References: <1388143942-1187-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <1388143942-1187-5-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <CAAXf6LX9ZMaBppPWkRG1me5h5EZ9umV-8MGKWVyN+EbAW4_hjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131229185313.43b17aaa@skate>
Message-ID: <87ob3zpbqa.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

Hi,

 > Why would we keep a very old gcc 4.7.x toolchain, but immediately get
 > rid of a more recent gcc 4.8 toolchain that is based on eglibc 2.17 ?

 > As we never managed to come up with a reasonable model to handle this,
 > I believe we should in the mean time continue to update the toolchains
 > as we used to do in the past.

Agreed.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard