From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:35 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit branch/next] Makefile: use /etc/os-release for version info rather than /etc/br-version In-Reply-To: <4F3A86D8.5010605@lucaceresoli.net> (Luca Ceresoli's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:52 +0100") References: <20120214121000.DDC1090A9E@busybox.osuosl.org> <4F3A86D8.5010605@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <87obt1v15w.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Luca" == Luca Ceresoli writes: Hi, >> NAME=Buildroot >> VERSION=2012.02-rc1-00003-g2d10e81 >> ID=buildroot >> VERSION_ID=2012.02-rc1 >> PRETTY_NAME="Buildroot 2012.02-rc1" Luca> Nice. Luca> I just wish PRETTY_NAME had at least a "-dirty" suffix to make it Luca> clear that it is not exactly equal to 2012.02-rc1 (at least when using Luca> a git clone). We can make it use BR2_VERSION_FULL, but I didn't find that particulary "pretty". I normally change the version string to -git right after a release, so it's only between -rc1 and the final release that there can be a bit of confusion (and you always have VERSION to figure it out). -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard