From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB91CA0EFA for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3C0843FF; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOR63-qcTmQv; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 554E98434B Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554E98434B; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19991C8 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED0484254 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id gRsBCBQ-In3M for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=34.202.193.197; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com; envelope-from=peter@korsgaard.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp1.osuosl.org A2E82842B5 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org A2E82842B5 Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com (sendmail.purelymail.com [34.202.193.197]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E82842B5 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Feedback-ID: 21632:4007:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: buildroot@buildroot.org Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id 1294810109; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Thu, 21 Aug 2025 21:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peko by dell.be.48ers.dk with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1upCTM-001GTU-12; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 23:05:24 +0200 From: Peter Korsgaard To: Florian Larysch Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org References: <20250816195542.3748-1-fl@n621.de> <87bjofm36c.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20250816204354.sdds7hpjzb5n7bkx@n621.de> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 23:05:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20250816204354.sdds7hpjzb5n7bkx@n621.de> (Florian Larysch's message of "Sat, 16 Aug 2025 22:43:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87plcol71n.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=LnZ801uRUS/AOld9j5a+JfAmAx9GNCcjey7rQlzhcGkHsD4+vSBkpG6lx1HMCbt0ZxSE/s4YaYd+mb8BjMPOtecpVs7zrKrTvY86yLYuofo4GNnmR2zf1gtsENPRCi5qgV0em9pbe3I7dQSDD7FrSX2o25vK1rWwk192fN7lODwbN5gqxiMjgFYw9o6gXq19MkQ+9txoVdD5F3CDnkZ/quMtclw26AC89yK4285w2GP9bhKV5Ut0fT3pzM1FZezyoFGPcn2zgLITVc/vq0jhX6YdIrAar//uLMB4uOcgolhM3Fe55vLk9Nh6oSTWqeTcB2RElDa6d1CU2qUiybFJYQ==; s=purelymail3; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=A+c2jq1wnCSDho8n8dLv/uNFkoGMsPJII/iA1vkXt/0=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=korsgaard.com X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=purelymail3 header.b=LnZ801uR Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/libjwt: require openssl X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" >>>>> "Florian" == Florian Larysch writes: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> While it can work with the combination gnutls + libopenssl, would there >> be any advantage over just using openssl for everything? > I've been wondering about this as well. It seems that applications using > libjwt can select between backends using an API call[1]. There don't > seem to be any feature differences between gnutls and openssl in my > cursory reading of the code. Furthermore, I could find no public use of > the backend switching API beyond libjwt's own test cases. > There seem to have been differences in feature completeness in the past > though[2][3], so it's possible that this is vestigial and/or the author > doesn't want to break existing applications more than necessary. > We could remove it from Buildroot entirely (though libjwt will still > automatically link to it when it detects gnutls in its sysroot via > pkg-config[4]), but it also doesn't hurt much as it doesn't enable the > gnutls dependency itself, so the overhead just is linking another object > file into the library OK. Committed after dropping the gnutls support, thanks. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot