From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:56:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] ruby: bump to version 2.1.2 In-Reply-To: <20140829091725.1fd32d4d@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:17:25 +0200") References: <1409264259-13058-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1409264259-13058-4-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <877g1rsr62.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20140829091725.1fd32d4d@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <87ppfjrapa.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Hi, >> I don't really know much about Ruby. Is 2.1.x compatible with 1.9.x or >> is it like Python2/Python3? > I don't really know much about Ruby either. But, about Ruby 2.0, > Wikipedia says: > "" > Ruby 2.0 is intended to be fully backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3. > As of the official 2.0.0 release on February 24, 2013, there were only > five known (minor) incompatibilities. > "" > And then, about Ruby 2.1, they say: > "" > Ruby 2.1.0 was released on Christmas Day in 2013.[31] The release > includes speed-ups, bugfixes, and library updates. Starting with 2.1.0, > Ruby is using semantic versioning. > "" > So I believe we can simply bump the ruby package to 2.1, and not bother > keeping two separate packages. Ok, thanks - Committed to next. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard