From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 20:11:20 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 04/28] linux: use the defconfig mechanism after tuning the config In-Reply-To: <20110708190853.126e7e3a@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 8 Jul 2011 19:08:53 +0200") References: <505d71eb153b750e7af08640a90e2efec8cbcf39.1309895466.git.thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <87pqllpxw5.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20110708190853.126e7e3a@skate> Message-ID: <87pqlkwsl3.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Thomas> Le Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:46:18 +0200, Thomas> Peter Korsgaard a ?crit : >> Why don't we just call 'make silentoldconfig' instead? Thomas> No, silentoldconfig, despite its name, will ask many questions when Thomas> the .config is simply a minimal defconfig. See below: Thomas> thomas at skate:~/projets/linux-2.6$ cp ../buildroot/board/qemu/arm-versatile/linux-2.6.38.config .config Thomas> thomas at skate:~/projets/linux-2.6$ make ARCH=arm silentoldconfig But it isn't a minimal config anymore, as we're doing make _defconfig, tweak, make silentoldconfig. Or am I missing something? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard