From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:59:11 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/5] Remove the "project" feature In-Reply-To: <20090908082707.18e19d6e@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> (Hans-Christian Egtvedt's message of "Tue\, 8 Sep 2009 08\:27\:07 +0200") References: <20090908082707.18e19d6e@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> Message-ID: <87pra153cw.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt writes: Hi, Hans-Christian> I use it all the time ;) How do you propose building Hans-Christian> for multiple targets? I would at least like to share Hans-Christian> the toolchain, preferably also libraries. The toolchain could fairly easily be shared with the external toolchain stuff we now have. I don't know about your targets, but for the configurations I'm using, the time to rebuild userland packages is insignificant compared to toolchain building. This is ofcourse less true if you need to build something big like X/gtk/Qt/.. Hans-Christian> I do however also like the KISS aspect of Buildroot. Yes, it does add quite some complexity. Hans-Christian> I did not think project_build_ARCH was confusing, but Hans-Christian> perhaps project_ part would be misleading? I would Hans-Christian> rather see a build/board/ setup. Keeping status quo and renaming directories will just lead to more confusion imho. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard