From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:00:59 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/binutils
In-Reply-To: <20090309065805.221e777e@hcegtvedt> (Hans-Christian Egtvedt's
	message of "Mon\, 9 Mar 2009 06\:58\:05 +0100")
References: <20090303220951.E40FB7626F@busybox.osuosl.org>
	<d6cda7730903060956r6a3c5fe8ra2ee09251ce81d61@mail.gmail.com>
	<878wnie4ab.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
	<d6cda7730903071820v7ba666ej2745c45f7d6ccf23@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090309065805.221e777e@hcegtvedt>
Message-ID: <87r617ceh0.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Hans-Christian" == Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> writes:

 Hans-Christian> Last news, about a month ago, is that the legal
 Hans-Christian> papers are gathering signatures. First attempt to
 Hans-Christian> gather signatures lead to a deadlock, FSF waiting for
 Hans-Christian> Atmel, Atmel waiting for FSF. But now they are,
 Hans-Christian> AFAIK, back on track.

Thanks - Ok, that's all the legal stuff - But what about the technical
work? I guess the FSF isn't particular interested in patches against
binutils 2.18 from 2007?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard