From: Christian Stewart <christian@paral.in>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/go: bump to version 1.12
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 01:23:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgvvccbr.fsf@paral.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+_SqVbzRuEgvansndPeSVqOeratEK5aGc+OGTc0e6j0FeJEkw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,
Angelo Compagnucci <angelo@amarulasolutions.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:24 PM Thomas Petazzoni
>> <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote:
>> > I am puzzled by your statement "currently undefined". Is it undefined
>> > in the sense "it is not defined yet how Buildroot will handle this" or
>> > "it is not defined in Go yet how the module compilation will work in
>> > 1.13" ?
>
> It's less of a problem with module support for go now, because the
> dependencies are proxyed and verified before being delivered to the go
> download mechanism, so the reproducibility is somewhat guaranteed.
> The problem remains for breaking the buildroot internal download
> mechanism and for not a so probably clear licensing of downloaded
> modules (I have to investigate this).
I'm beginning to work on this now, would it be acceptable if Buildroot
adopted the following approach:
- Remove GOPATH
- Configure Go to download module files to buildroot/dl/go-modules
- Set GOPROXY to allow network during download step only.
- Require go.mod and go.sum hashes for all Go packages.
- During extract step, run "go mod vendor" to extract code to build/
- Use vendored building mode "-mod=vendor"
This should allow Go to download and verify modules correctly during the
download step, to the Buildroot dl/ tree, as well as disallowing network
fetching during the build phase, and extracting versioned module code to
the build directory.
Best,
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-10 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 3:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/go: bump to version 1.12 Christian Stewart
2019-02-26 7:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-02-26 7:46 ` Christian Stewart
2019-02-26 7:53 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2019-03-10 9:23 ` Christian Stewart [this message]
2019-03-10 10:28 ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-03-11 0:08 ` Christian Stewart
2019-03-11 23:50 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-03-12 3:35 ` Christian Stewart
2019-03-12 9:28 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgvvccbr.fsf@paral.in \
--to=christian@paral.in \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox