From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:28:11 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 00/12 v8] Introduce libudev (branch yem/libudev-4) In-Reply-To: (Bernd Kuhls's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:01:27 +0200") References: <20160716154736.19dd42fb@free-electrons.com> <20160718175241.GA3738@free.fr> <87twfawymj.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <87shuttsmc.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Kuhls writes: Hi, >> > But then you would not have libudev if you use mdev or a static /dev. >> >> Is that a common use case? I wouldn't expect anybody to use static /dev >> any more > the fli4l (http://www.fli4l.de/en/home/news/) distro uses buildroot to build > its binaries and has BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_CREATION_STATIC=y > in both the development branch > https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/4.0/trunk/src/packages/s > rc/src/fbr/buildroot/.config-x86?hb=true#to309 > and the stable branch > https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/3.10/trunk/src/packages/ > src/src/fbr/buildroot/.config-x86?hb=true#to255 Ok, but why? Devtmpfs has been available in the kernel since ~2.6.32 or so. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard