From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:24:27 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot Developer Day, Friday 3rd February,
	Brussels
In-Reply-To: <20120127125805.580febd8@skate> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of
 "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:58:05 +0100")
References: <20120124000812.6d043023@skate>
 <CAAXf6LW6aCs-G_FD=pXNGsBrV3133donzNxsuNV_7O=9JMCs4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <201201271133.20517.arnout@mind.be> <20120127125805.580febd8@skate>
Message-ID: <87sjj1jhhw.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

Hi,

 Thomas> Peter: could you try to handle the patches in a more FIFO fashion,
 Thomas> rather than the LIFO fashion you're using these days? There are many
 Thomas> patches that have been waiting for a very long time, while the most
 Thomas> recent patches are being taken into account very quickly. Some
 Thomas> examples: the host tools menu Arnout is referring to, or Maxime
 Thomas> Ripard's patches on the per-package device/permission stuff.

Completely FIFO is not an option with the current backlog as updates are
sometimes sent and the latest version should be used, but I agree - The
situation is not optimal.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard