From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:30:46 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] problem building openswan using svn-buildroot In-Reply-To: <93F12DDAEC3E4BBFBAA4E030667F5EDD@aeglos> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Tue\, 24 Feb 2009 22\:42\:46 +0100") References: <499E05A7.2070403@unix-beratung.de> <87bpsv6ik4.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <49A17E91.7060104@unix-beratung.de> <87y6vy5okv.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090223102825.GB31413@cbg.dyndns.org> <87hc2l2yns.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1235456068.24843.35.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <87mycc1etl.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <93F12DDAEC3E4BBFBAA4E030667F5EDD@aeglos> Message-ID: <87skm3zcvd.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: Hi, >> Well - It's HUGE (>7M), but OK, I'll mark it as BROKEN and remove if >> after the 2009.05 release unless someone steps up to fix it. I'll also >> remove the kernel patches as we remove old kernel versions. Ulf> If you feel that the stuff should not be in the svn, then Ulf> make the patches loadable and store the patches in the mirror. What will that change if it's broken? Ulf> As pointed out to you earlier, buildroot users are using Ulf> linux-2.6.22 and later so there is no reason to remove things Ulf> which is active use. Again, it makes sense to move the patches Ulf> to the mirror, but yuu are the only one to have write acdess as Ulf> far as I know. Active openswan users? How come we haven't seen any bugreports or patches since 2007 then? As said earlier, I think it's absolutely critical to trim the package versions between releases, otherwise we'll never be able to get any significant testing coverage. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard