From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin =?utf-8?Q?Niestr=C3=B3j?= Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 12:39:33 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/python-xmodem: new package In-Reply-To: References: <20200430132020.2476465-1-m.niestroj@grinn-global.com> <87d07p85mm.fsf@grinn-global.com> Message-ID: <87tv0y62oq.fsf@grinn-global.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Asaf, Asaf Kahlon writes: > Hello, > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:28 PM Marcin Niestr?j > wrote: >> >> Hi All! >> >> The problem with this package is that there is no license file when we >> download from pypi. But there is one on github. Question is: what should >> we do about it? > > We already have some python packages which don't include the license > on the tarball, although it exists in the repo. > Most of the times, it's because the maintainer of the package didn't add > the license file in MANIFEST.in (which seems to be your case too). > On those cases, PKG-INFO is mostly used, but it's not the preferred > solution, so I suggest to send a PR for adding the license to > MANIFEST.in > You can see an example from snmpclitools here: > https://github.com/etingof/snmpclitools/commit/d93597050f7e4708ce875cc47274c39a9e63da11 Thanks for hints! If it takes reasonable time to merge, then I will post v2 with LICENSE. If not, then I will try PKG-INFO for the time before next package release. -- Regards, Marcin Niestr?j