From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] ngrep: bump to version 1.47
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:54:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvkubkf2.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181106085910.665564c3@windsurf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:59:10 +0100")
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:
> Hello,
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:14:48 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>> Since we don't really want to pass any flags from Buildroot down to the package
>> build systems, perhaps we should just set
>>
>> override MAKE := make <jlevel stuff>
>>
>> at the top of package/Makefile.in? I've done a quick test, and it seems to fix
>> the boa issue at least.
>>
>> This would revert the following commit though:
>>
>> commit 4705b600764c683e934da7db54f7971a3c647e8a
>> Author: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
>> Date: Tue Jul 17 14:09:07 2007
>>
>> Ensure we use host 'make', even when building 'make' in buildroot
>>
>> but that doesn't explain why it is not wanted to use the Buildroot-built make...
> But then it would mean that if you have a build like this:
> packageA
> packageB
> packageC
> host-make
> packageD
> packageE
> packageF
> then package{A,B,C} would be built with the system-provided make, and
> then package{D,E,F} would be built with host-make ? Is this really a
> desirable situation ?
Well, it sounds better than the breakage we have today.
In general, mixing make versions in recursive invocations seems a bit
icky. I guess we could end up with issues if/when we do toplevel
parallel builds as well if the job control tracking differs between
versions.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-06 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-01 13:23 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] ngrep: bump to version 1.47 Fabrice Fontaine
2018-11-01 13:23 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] ngrep: add libnet optional dependency Fabrice Fontaine
2018-11-03 21:42 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] ngrep: bump to version 1.47 Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-03 22:01 ` Fabrice Fontaine
2018-11-04 10:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-04 11:04 ` Fabrice Fontaine
2018-11-04 11:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-04 11:34 ` Baruch Siach
2018-11-06 0:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-11-06 7:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-11-06 9:54 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2018-11-06 10:31 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-11-06 11:18 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tvkubkf2.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox