From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:49:15 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/qt5: bump latest version to 5.9.1 In-Reply-To: <20170714153641.0e0af325@windsurf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:36:41 +0200") References: <1499796056-841-1-git-send-email-joshua.henderson@microchip.com> <7248234a-60d3-3bf5-0954-ff0442609136@mind.be> <69cf264e-bb78-3823-e165-5a3378806741@microchip.com> <0db10485-c5ee-5097-97f4-aaadd2535761@microchip.com> <20170713095003.057fb2bc@windsurf.orange-hotspot.com> <20170713153220.GA3002@scaer> <2a450d8b-10a6-2be9-b7a7-a659a47bffb0@mind.be> <20170714103518.66ca2b7e@windsurf> <87o9snb1ri.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20170714153641.0e0af325@windsurf> Message-ID: <87tw2f9lic.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Hi, >> As long as we can find a solution for this problem I don't think we >> should move to sperate files for license hashes. We have 2k+ packages >> and only a very small subset of those have a version selection (and only >> a small subset of that subset will change the license text between >> versions), so I prefer a less-clean solution for this special case >> instead of adding 2k+ extra files to the tree. > Yes, true. > So perhaps the easy solution is to search for a hash file in the > version-specific sub-folder. If it exists, use it (and only this one). > If it doesn't exist, fallback to the one in the package directory. Yes, makes sense to me. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard