From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:30:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/7] portmap: add nommu support In-Reply-To: <201101111250.24179.vapier@gentoo.org> (Mike Frysinger's message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:50:23 -0500") References: <1294669718-5339-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1294669725-5379-4-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <87lj2r3f8m.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <201101111250.24179.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <87tyhfyyhw.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes: Hi, Mike> On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 05:29:45 Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> What's the upstream status of these patches? Mike> they've been sent multiple times, but upstream portmap hasnt Mike> responded to anyone in a while Ok, thanks. >> What is this NO_PERROR thing? That belongs in the next patch rather than >> here, right? Mike> yes Ok. >> Why not simply rename it like the recent issue with getline -> get_line >> in kconfig? Mike> because perror is a standard, not a gnuism like getline Yes, but why is there a perror() implementation in portmapper in the first place? It seems like they want something-looking-like-perror-but-using-syslog, rather than the real perror? >> Out of interest, what functionaly in portmapper do you miss with >> NO_FORK? Mike> the forks are only used to speed up responses Ok. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard