From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:06:32 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/linux-pam: security bump to version 1.5.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126192950.135871-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> (Fabrice Fontaine's message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:29:50 +0100") References: <20201126192950.135871-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87v9dsrtkn.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Fabrice" == Fabrice Fontaine writes: > Fix CVE-2020-27780 - authentication bypass when a user doesn't exist and > root password is blank > https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/tag/v1.5.1 > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine > --- > package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash | 4 ++-- > package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > diff --git a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash > index 15e67a5e4c..10cd7be9c4 100644 > --- a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash > +++ b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.hash > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > # Locally computed hashes after checking signature at > -# https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/download/v1.5.0/Linux-PAM-1.5.0.tar.xz.asc > +# https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/download/v1.5.1/Linux-PAM-1.5.1.tar.xz.asc > # signed with the key 8C6BFD92EE0F42EDF91A6A736D1A7F052E5924BB > -sha256 02d39854b508fae9dc713f7733bbcdadbe17b50de965aedddd65bcb6cc7852c8 Linux-PAM-1.5.0.tar.xz > +sha256 201d40730b1135b1b3cdea09f2c28ac634d73181ccd0172ceddee3649c5792fc Linux-PAM-1.5.1.tar.xz > # Locally computed > sha256 133d98e7a2ab3ffd330b4debb0bfc10fea21e4b2b5a5b09de2e924293be5ff08 Copyright > diff --git a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk > index 176830c1d3..61d9542c02 100644 > --- a/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk > +++ b/package/linux-pam/linux-pam.mk > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > # > ################################################################################ > -LINUX_PAM_VERSION = 1.5.0 > +LINUX_PAM_VERSION = 1.5.1 Ehh, we only have 1.4.0 in master and next? It would be good to notice that this security issue only exists in pam 1.5.0. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard