From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:05:24 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] package/libressl: bump to version 3.0.2 In-Reply-To: <20191118090655.16ea0e92@windsurf.home> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:06:55 +0100") References: <20191107210345.AE0CB8E9EF@busybox.osuosl.org> <87zhgtsjiq.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20191118090655.16ea0e92@windsurf.home> Message-ID: <87v9rhsgff.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:58:37 +0100 > Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: >> >> > commit: https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=26f42106e8acfd336d8e902da96cd2ac9e63c09d >> > branch: https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=refs/heads/master >> >> > Signed-off-by: Adam Duskett >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard >> >> > [Thomas: cherry-picked to master as it fixes a build issue with the >> > musl C library: >> > output/build/libressl-2.9.2/crypto/compat/getprogname_linux.c: In function __getprogname__: >> > output/build/libressl-2.9.2/crypto/compat/getprogname_linux.c:32:2: >> > error: #error "Cannot emulate getprogname" >> > #error "Cannot emulate getprogname"] >> >> Hmm, where do you see that? We also still have 2.9.2 on 2019.08.x and I >> don't see any build issues on the autobuilders: >> >> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=libressl-% > The autobuilders are not testing libressl. Selecting libressl is part > of a choice, and therefore not randomized by our autobuilders. Ahh yes, true. So presumably this should also be cherry picked for 2019.08.x? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard