From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:04:02 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] So what do we do about all the unmaintained boards? In-Reply-To: <1233182567.4147.16.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Wed\, 28 Jan 2009 23\:42\:47 +0100") References: <1233182567.4147.16.camel@elrond.atmel.com> Message-ID: <87vdryrw65.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: Ulf> VENDOR BOARD KERNEL Ulf> AMD Dbu1500 2.6.19.1 Ulf> ARM AT91SAM9260 2.6.24 REMOVE? Ulf> ARMLTD Integrator926 2.6.22.9 Ulf> Atmel Plenty All are or will soon be 2.6.28 Ulf> Hitachi MS7206SE01 No kernel config Ulf> jp q5 2.4.26/29/32 REMOVE? Ulf> KWIKBYTE kb9202 2.6.24 Ulf> mips malta 2.6.21.5 Ulf> Sharp LNode80 2.4.26 REMOVE? Ulf> Soekris net4521/4801 2.4.29 REMOVE? Ulf> Valka v100sc2 No kernel config Ulf> Via epia-mii 2.6.11.5 REMOVE? Ulf> x86 i386 2.6.21.5 Ulf> The reason for removing the ARM directory, is that it does not make Ulf> any sense to do a "generic ARM". I have been wanting to get rid of (atleast all the really ancient) boards for some time, I don't remember ever seeing any updates to them. Either we mark them as DEPRECATED and remove them after the release, or we do it now. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard