From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30053C4828F for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5158405B7; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:41:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org A5158405B7 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJHGWqfumg-n; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39AB40420; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:41:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org A39AB40420 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C192A1BF407 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D2140420 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:40:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org A5D2140420 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtvFqvd8YnrK for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::228]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A169402F2 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:40:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 5A169402F2 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25B591BF205; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peko by dell.be.48ers.dk with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rWkEQ-00ABCL-37; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 22:40:54 +0100 From: Peter Korsgaard To: "Yann E. MORIN" References: <20240122223037.889955-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2024 22:40:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Yann E. MORIN's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:28:03 +0100") Message-ID: <87wmrjvrfd.fsf@48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: peter@korsgaard.com Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/uuu: fix build failure with host gcc 13.x X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Giulio Benetti , Dario Binacchi , buildroot@buildroot.org, Giulio Benetti Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" >>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN writes: > Giulio, All, > On 2024-01-22 23:30 +0100, Giulio Benetti spake thusly: >> From: Giulio Benetti >> >> With gcc version >= 13.x stdint.h must be explicitly included according to >> [0] so add local patch to explicitly include stdint.h. > When I read "local patch", it is not immediately obvious that this is a > backport, or that the patch has been upstreamd, and I am wary of such > situations. > But here, this is an actual backport, so a better phrasing would have > been "so backport a commit that...", which I have done when applying. >> [0]: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html >> >> Fixes: >> still not happened >> >> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti >> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti > Applied to master, thanks. Committed to 2023.02.x (where it does apply), thanks. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot