From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68495C4332F for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031DD41E41; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 031DD41E41 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wP0GE60TZNi4; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493F541DB9; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 493F541DB9 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DA31BF389 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665324018F for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 665324018F X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPNj6E_Rk187 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C30A40129 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 0C30A40129 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FAE0240006; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peko by dell.be.48ers.dk with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r2ehU-00BY1h-2C; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 22:42:32 +0100 From: Peter Korsgaard To: Luca Ceresoli References: <20231018111357.2898095-1-neal.frager@amd.com> <20231031121222.1dfa4035@booty> <20231031133415.1d89db5a@windsurf> <8a0d97bb-2fe5-4e09-8e95-b928a431ce1e@amd.com> <87bkce21br.fsf@48ers.dk> <20231113181023.34bf6492@booty> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 22:42:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20231113181023.34bf6492@booty> (Luca Ceresoli's message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:10:23 +0100") Message-ID: <87wmule3ef.fsf@48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: peter@korsgaard.com Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/zynq_zc702_defconfig: new defconfig X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Simek, Michal" , "Frager, Neal" , Thomas Petazzoni , "buildroot@buildroot.org" , romain.naour@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" >>>>> "Luca" == Luca Ceresoli writes: > Hi, > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:39:36 +0100 > Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> >>>>> "Frager," == Frager, Neal writes: >> >> Hi, >> >> > The remaining question is just a matter of how many zynq, zynqmp and >> > versal defconfigs is the right amount for buildroot? I would like to >> > be able to support the following 11 boards, if it would be ok for the >> > buildroot community. 5 of these 11 are already included in >> > buildroot. >> >> > zynq_zc702 >> > zynq_zc706 >> > zynqmp_zcu102 >> > zynqmp_zcu104 >> > zynqmp_zcu106 >> > zynqmp_kria_kd240 >> > zynqmp_kria_kr260 >> > zynqmp_kria_kv260 >> > versal_vck190 >> > versal_vek280 (coming next year) >> > versal_vmk180 >> >> > In exchange, I would be ok with dropping the zynq_qmtech board and >> > possibly one of the zynq_zed >> > boards. >> >> I think the main issue with a lot of defconfigs is maintaining them (but >> you already do that) and the CI overhead from building all of them. >> >> I guess we could come up with some logic to skip some of the zynq* >> defconfigs from the Gitlab CI setup. Romain, any good ideas? > After the discussion it seems quite clear that the patch is useful, and > the CI aspects can perhaps be sorted out, so: > Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli Committed, thanks. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot