From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:19:42 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] vala: add vala/valac wrapper In-Reply-To: <20160223104816.20c97306@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:48:16 +0100") References: <1454428908-7183-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20160221222816.4e53e921@free-electrons.com> <56CA62D8.10309@zacarias.com.ar> <56CB9DFA.506@mind.be> <56CBA547.3020200@zacarias.com.ar> <56CBAA86.4070305@mind.be> <56CBB0B1.6020506@zacarias.com.ar> <56CC2980.1020402@mind.be> <20160223104816.20c97306@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <87wppv78tt.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: > Hello, > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:42:24 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> This could indeed be a good idea. One reason to limit the number of committers >> was to avoid conflicts (i.e. two committers working on the same patch in >> parallel), but as I understand it, Thomas and Peter noticed that this isn't >> really a problem in practice. >> >> So indeed, having a third person that applies trivial patches could be >> worthwhile to try. >> >> That said, Yann and I are already spending a large part of our buildroot time >> on reviewing patches. I don't think that applying them immediately is going to >> make that much of a difference. > Fully agreed: applying the patch is clearly not what takes time. It's a > mechanical and stupid operation. Agreed. I'm all for ways of improving our ways of working, but I don't think this will change much. Adding Thomas as a co-maintainer has imho been very good, but adding a 3rd committer without having more reviewers imho won't make any significant difference. -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard