From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:26:38 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] busybox 1.18.3: add patches for klogd and menuconfig In-Reply-To: <20110310135756.1031efb0@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:57:56 +0100") References: <1299759904-22003-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <1299759904-22003-3-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20110310135756.1031efb0@surf> Message-ID: <87wrk76r8x.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Hi, Thomas> Is it really necessary to add Busybox patches all the time, since they Thomas> got deprecated pretty quickly by newer releases ? I mean, at the time Thomas> of the Buildroot release, it of course make sense to have the latest Thomas> Busybox release with the latest fixes, but during the development Thomas> phase, is it really useful ? I personally don't mind the (pretty minimal) churn. I find it a good thing that git works as good as possible (E.G. fixed for known issues are included), as it helps testing at all times, not only just before a release. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard