From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:00:48 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 06/14] allow for testing gcc-4.5 In-Reply-To: <20091007203323.GF23847@mx.loc> (Bernhard Reutner-Fischer's message of "Wed\, 7 Oct 2009 22\:33\:23 +0200") References: <4acf0a418a2f34c50249d56c6e76b8dba7076302.1254945750.git.rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <8ddd0fbdd88acec5c801c93ce830b1ad04536118.1254945750.git.rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <382fdbb8e5e36dd9348dfd57b9267862ef8d2ead.1254945750.git.rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <87vdirj6k6.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20091007203323.GF23847@mx.loc> Message-ID: <87ws36j4vz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer writes: Bernhard> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer writes: >> Bernhard> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Bernhard> --- Bernhard> toolchain/gcc/Config.in | 12 ++++++------ >> >> No uclibc-specific patches? Bernhard> you don't even default to 4.4.1 IIRC, so no not at this time. No, because of reported C++ issues. Does 4.5(-pre) even build for uclibc without minimal patches? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard