From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:06:07 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] ARM cores In-Reply-To: <20110124180428.3bcbe29f@surf> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:04:28 +0100") References: <1295822495-16972-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1295822495-16972-7-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <87lj2ahe4y.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20110124165711.381989cf@surf> <87y66athl7.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20110124180428.3bcbe29f@surf> Message-ID: <87y66arrrk.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: Hi, Thomas> Instead of having the list of gazillions ARM SoC, we could also Thomas> extend a bit our architecture-specific options: Thomas> * Has NEON support ? Thomas> shown only if > ARMv7 is selected Thomas> * Floating point type (with a choice of soft-float, VFPv2, VFPv3) Thomas> * Floating point ABI (soft, softfp, hard) Thomas> But it means that the user needs more knowledge on the details of the Thomas> ARM SoC he is using. But it's probably the only realistic solution. Yes, agreed. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard